Asean’s unified capital market faces obstacles as member states resist sharing data, forex, and fiscal policies. DBS Bank’s Tan Chek Soon calls this the “biggest elephant in the room,” while IDEAS’ Rebecca Sta Maria advocates “baby steps” like Asean Business Entities for easier labour mobility.
Key Points
- Asean’s push for a unified regional capital market faces major obstacles, as member states remain reluctant to share control over data, foreign exchange, fiscal, and trade policies. DBS Bank’s Tan Chek Soon called this sovereignty issue “the biggest elephant in the room,” though he believes Asean’s talent pool can eventually overcome these challenges.
- A harmonised Asean capital market would make the region more attractive to global investors by functioning as a single investment bloc, improving capital allocation by connecting capital-rich markets like Singapore and Malaysia with high-growth economies like Indonesia seeking funding for listings.
- IDEAS’ Rebecca Fatima Sta Maria advocates “baby steps” toward regional integration, highlighting a proposal to designate firms as “Asean Business Entities,” allowing skilled employees to move freely across regional branches with reduced bureaucratic hurdles, serving as a pragmatic step toward broader labour mobility.
Barriers to Asean’s Unified Capital Market
The Challenge of Sovereignty: Asean’s vision of a unified regional capital market continues to face significant obstacles, primarily due to member states’ reluctance to relinquish control over data, foreign exchange policies, and fiscal regulations. DBS Bank’s head of investment banking coverage for Malaysia, Tan Chek Soon, described this as “the biggest elephant in the room.” Drawing parallels with the European Union, he noted that meaningful integration requires nations to surrender certain sovereign authorities — a politically sensitive trade-off that Asean members have yet to fully embrace.
The Case for Integration: Despite these challenges, Tan remains optimistic about the region’s potential. He argued that a harmonised capital market — spanning equities, bond settlements, and regulatory disclosures — would make Asean significantly more attractive to global investors by positioning the region as a unified investment bloc. He further highlighted the opportunity to improve capital allocation, enabling capital-rich markets like Singapore and Malaysia to fund high-growth economies such as Indonesia, where promising companies struggle due to relatively smaller domestic markets.
Pragmatic Steps Toward Regional Integration
Labour Mobility as a Starting Point: Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs director Tan Sri Dr Rebecca Fatima Sta Maria advocated for practical “baby steps” rather than sweeping reforms. She highlighted a proposal by the Asean Business Advisory Council to designate selected firms as “Asean Business Entities” (ABEs), granting them the ability to move skilled employees across regional branches with greater ease, reducing bureaucratic hurdles related to work permits and temporary transfers.
Incremental Progress Over Ambitious Overhauls: Rebecca acknowledged that a European-style Schengen Agreement for free movement remains a distant goal for Asean. However, she emphasised that targeted measures — such as allowing temporary intra-company staff movement of up to three months — represent meaningful progress. These incremental reforms, while modest, provide the business community with a realistic pathway toward deeper regional integration without requiring immediate political consensus on broader sovereignty issues.
Source : Data sovereignty concerns stall Asean capital market unity — DBS
