• Login
Monday, April 27, 2026
Geneva Times
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
Geneva Times
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
Home Business

When holding out backfired: The decision that doomed Lehman Brothers

GenevaTimes by GenevaTimes
April 27, 2026
in Business
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
When holding out backfired: The decision that doomed Lehman Brothers
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Lloyd Blankfein, former CEO of Goldman Sachs, recalls the chaotic days around the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008 in his memoir Streetwise. Select excerpts from his book. 

Lehman’s Historic Fall

We were back at the Fed early on Sunday. But that afternoon, the news came that the Barclays deal was not to be. The British financial authorities said they would block the merger — if Bank of America didn’t want Lehman, they weren’t going to trust what was under the hood. Hank (Henry Paulson) and Tim (Timothy Geithner) were out of options. There was no other plan. We CEOs began once again to focus on our own institutions, to prepare for the turmoil ahead. 

In the wee hours of Monday morning, before the market open, Lehman filed for bankruptcy— the largest one in US history. Everyone saw the pictures of employees streaming out of its headquarters in Midtown holding boxes filled with their family pictures and personal effects. Lehman Brothers was an even older firm than Goldman Sachs. 

On September 15, 2008, it failed and was gone after 158 years in business because people lost confidence, and it didn’t make a deal when it could have. Dick Fuld kept holding out for a higher price or better terms from potential acquirers. A lot of great firms have as part of their history surviving huge losses and near- death experiences.

Fuld broke the basic rule of running any institution: Eliminate the biggest existential risks at any cost. The first requirement of business is to stay in business. You can recover from losses and live to fight another day. You can’t recover from being dead.

Back to Goldman

On Monday morning, we drove past the horde of cameras, protesters, and gawkers gathered at the entrance to the New York Fed and into the underground parking garage. I assembled there with the rest of our team before heading up to the boardroom. We hadn’t gotten much sleep and were about to go into a fourth consecutive day of meetings, likely to continue into the evening.

“I don’t think I can take another day of this,” one of our team members complained.

“For crying out loud, you’re getting out of a Mercedes in the basement of the New York Fed. You’re not getting out of a Higgins boat on Omaha Beach! Get a grip!”

It was a performance for the team. But I was speaking to myself as well.

The collapse of Lehman Brothers began a week that felt like a year yet also went by in a dizzying flash. Those of us who favored letting Lehman go, including Ben Bernanke, saw quickly how big the price was. The results were near catastrophic, and the shock waves just kept coming. The stock market fell 5 percent that day, with all the major financial firms dropping by double digits. 

The most immediate consequence of the default was that a huge money-market fund that held a small portion of its assets in Lehman’s commercial paper “broke the buck.” That meant that a dollar held in the fund was worth less than a dollar— something that isn’t supposed to ever happen. Not surprising, that news triggered a run by people desperate to get their uninsured deposits out. Unable to meet redemption requests, the fund froze withdrawals and then quickly began liquidating. Even “as good as cash” now seemed unsafe.

After Lehman, the next most vulnerable investment bank was Merrill Lynch. After Merrill, it was Morgan Stanley. And if Morgan Stanley, then potentially Goldman Sachs, despite our healthy balance sheet and lack of material net subprime exposure. It was like living in a five- story building with the waters rising. Bear Stearns was on the first floor, and Lehman was on the second. Merrill Lynch was on the third floor. Morgan Stanley was on the fourth. Goldman was on the fifth floor, the highest one. But if you dropped a pebble out the window, you heard the splash a little too soon.

(Excerpted from Streetwise: Lessons From a Life at Goldman Sachs by Lloyd Blankfein, with permission from the publishers, Orion Publishing Group/Hachette India.)

Read More

Previous Post

USA Icon Cobi Jones Immortalized With Statue, Reus Leads Galaxy To Victory

Next Post

What Britain wants from King Charles’ trip to Trumpland – POLITICO

Next Post
What Britain wants from King Charles’ trip to Trumpland – POLITICO

What Britain wants from King Charles’ trip to Trumpland – POLITICO

ADVERTISEMENT
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn

Explore the Geneva Times

  • About us
  • Contact us

Contact us:

editor@thegenevatimes.ch

Visit us

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin