• Login
Monday, April 20, 2026
Geneva Times
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
Geneva Times
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
Home Business

Tata Steel faces €27 million fine, withdrawal of its permit over emission norm violations in Netherlands 

GenevaTimes by GenevaTimes
December 20, 2024
in Business
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
Tata Steel faces €27 million fine, withdrawal of its permit over emission norm violations in Netherlands 
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Tata Steel faces a potential penalty of €27 million from the Dutch Environmental Service due to emissions violations at two of its plants in the Netherlands. 

The company has been given eight weeks to significantly reduce emissions of harmful substances. If Tata Steel fails to comply, it may face fines up to €27 million. Dutch authorities have also warned that they may consider revoking the plant’s permit if its coking gas factory 2 does not meet the legal standards within a year. 

The Dutch Environmental Service has reported that harmful substances, including heavy metals and carcinogenic PAHs, are being emitted from the chimneys of Tata Steel’s coking gas plants 1 and 2.  

According to a report published on December 19, inspections carried out in February and August found emissions at levels 20 times above the legal limit at factory 1 and five times above the limit at factory 2. The Environmental Service has given Tata Steel eight weeks to address these violations before a follow-up assessment. 

In response, Tata Steel stated its commitment to improving the plants and expressed disagreement with the notification’s content and its underlying reasons. The company is seeking further discussions with the Environmental Service, the province, and other stakeholders. 

“We find the way in which these decisions were made very painful,” the steelmaker statement said, adding that the factory “plays an important role in our continuity and our Green Steel plan.” 

Both coking gas plants have been under increased scrutiny since 2023. Earlier this year, the Expert Group Health IJmond advised closing the outdated factory 2 to reduce safety risks. However, Tata Steel plans to keep the factory open until at least 2029. The Environmental Service has previously fined Tata for the release of toxic substances from the plant’s “raw coke” production. 

The Environmental Service has stated that factory 2 does not meet legal requirements, and in October, it indicated that measures would be enforced. Tata Steel now has six weeks to submit a plan of action to bring the factory into compliance, with a year to implement the necessary changes. If the company fails to meet the legal standards within that time frame, the Environmental Service may revoke its license. 

Read More

Previous Post

BBC goes inside Syrian prison holding IS detainees

Next Post

Switzerland could build new nuclear power plants

Next Post
Switzerland could build new nuclear power plants

Switzerland could build new nuclear power plants

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ADVERTISEMENT
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn

Explore the Geneva Times

  • About us
  • Contact us

Contact us:

editor@thegenevatimes.ch

Visit us

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin