• Login
Wednesday, July 8, 2026
Geneva Times
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
Geneva Times
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
Home Switzerland

Swiss investors ramp up pressure at shareholder meetings

GenevaTimes by GenevaTimes
July 7, 2026
in Switzerland
Reading Time: 10 mins read
0
Swiss investors ramp up pressure at shareholder meetings
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Shareholders’ meetings at large companies: investor pressure is making itself felt

Shareholders’ meetings at large companies: investor pressure is making itself felt


Keystone-SDA

Shareholders are intensifying pressure on boards of directors and senior management at large Swiss companies.





Generated with artificial intelligence.


This content was published on


July 7, 2026 – 13:30

But the 2026 season of annual general meetings (AGMs) at major Swiss companies avoided any major upsets, according to analysis by Swipra, a Zurich-based consultancy specialising in corporate governance and sustainability, on the top 100 companies in the SPI Swiss stock market’s index.

The most striking finding concerns the role of key shareholders such as families, founders or public investors. Without their support, as many as 97 agenda items would have been rejected. This represents a significant jump from the 37 cases in the previous year, signalling growing dissent amongst minority shareholders.

The study highlights how shareholders’ criticisms are becoming “more targeted and less generalised”. The main targets are board chairs, remuneration committees and external auditors. While the median proportion of ‘no’ votes for board member elections remained stable, in the 10% of the most contested votes, opposition reached an average of 47%.

More

Nick Hayek

More

Activist takes on Swatch maverick as Omega empire falters




This content was published on


May 19, 2025



Nick Hayek has overseen a decade of decline at the watchmaker. Can he see off the threat to his grip on the group?



Read more: Activist takes on Swatch maverick as Omega empire falters


The real flashpoint remains remuneration policy for executives. At the most contentious AGMs regarding remuneration, votes against rose to an average of 54%.

Investors are viewing long-term share-based remuneration plans with growing scepticism, deeming them too complex, and are beginning to shift their focus from the transparency of reports – now considered acceptable – to the absolute level of salaries.

The figures confirm this: for the 20 companies included in the SMI (the stock exchange’s main index), the median total remuneration of CEOs rose by 6.1% to CHF8.2 million, driven mainly by long-term variable components.

Swipra’s analysis also identifies an emerging area of conflict: the independence of external auditors. Votes against their re-election, in the most contested cases, have more than doubled, rising from 22% to 41%.

Shareholders are concerned about the length of auditors’ terms of office, which are often very long: over a fifth of SPI-listed companies have been using the same auditor for more than 20 years.

More

Tidjane Thiam, CEO of Switzerland s second biggest bank Credit Suisse

More

Swiss firms face greater shareholder opposition




This content was published on


Aug 22, 2017



Shareholder rebellion over executive pay at Credit Suisse earlier this year is just one example of growing dissent by Swiss company owners.



Read more: Swiss firms face greater shareholder opposition


Tensions are also rising over environmental, social and governance issues. Around 10% of minority shareholders voted against sustainability reports, double the percentage recorded two years ago.

Finally, Swipra has raised concerns about the predictability of general meetings, due to so-called ‘split voting’: in fact, an increasing number of asset managers are allowing their institutional clients to issue independent voting instructions for indirectly held shareholdings, making voting outcomes less predictable and further fragmenting the investor base.

+ How we produce English news
Translated from German, reviewed by an English Department journalist. 

Articles in this story

Read More

Previous Post

Video. Tibetan activists detained outside Chinese Embassy in New Delhi

Next Post

MLB All-Star Appearances Leaders: Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, Active Leaders

Next Post
MLB All-Star Appearances Leaders: Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, Active Leaders

MLB All-Star Appearances Leaders: Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, Active Leaders

ADVERTISEMENT
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn

Explore the Geneva Times

  • About us
  • Contact us

Contact us:

editor@thegenevatimes.ch

Visit us

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin