By Mon Abrea, CPA, MBA, MPA (Harvard)
Global Tax Policy Expert | Chief Tax Advisor, Asian Consulting Group (ACGlobal)
The Philippines is competing for global capital at a time when investors are rethinking supply chains, tax structures, energy security and geopolitical risk. Our response cannot simply be to offer more incentives.
We must offer something more valuable: credible institutions, competitive policies and a government that works.
As our Philippine Investment Mission heads to South Korea and Japan this quarter, followed by Canada, the United States and Europe in the fourth quarter, we should be clear about what we are really selling to the world.
Not just tax incentives. Not just a young workforce. Not just strategic location.
We should be selling a reforming Philippines built around three measurable outcomes:
MORE PAY. MORE INVESTMENTS. BETTER GOVERNMENT.
There is reason for optimism. The Board of Investments approved about P462 billion in projects in the first half of 2026, while PEZA approved roughly P141 billion in new and expansion projects during the same period. CREATE MORE and the new Strategic Investment Priority Plan have further strengthened our investment proposition.
Through Asian Consulting Group (ACGlobal)’s Philippine Investment Mission and the global launch of WHY INVEST IN THE PHILIPPINES? CREATE MORE Edition, we continue collaborating with the BOI, PEZA, Philippine Trade and Investment Centers and Philippine embassies abroad through business forums, CEO briefings, policy discussions, investor aftercare and tax consultations.
But incentives may get investors interested. Institutions make them stay.
The feedback we hear from investors should therefore become part of a measurable reform program toward 2028.
First, increase Filipino take-home pay.
The proposed increase in the personal income tax exemption threshold from P250,000 is welcome, but it should be the beginning rather than the end of reform.
I have proposed a roadmap toward P400,000, then P800,000 and ultimately P1 million in tax-free income, with deeper relief tied to measurable improvements in revenue collection.
The principle is simple: economic growth becomes more inclusive when working Filipinos keep more of what they earn.
Fiscal responsibility should not automatically mean imposing new or higher taxes on workers and compliant businesses. Tax relief can stimulate consumption, savings and investment while government improves collection elsewhere.
Second, attract investors — and make them stay.
Investment promotion should not end when a project receives approval.
Government must give equal importance to investor aftercare, expansion and retention. Major regulatory problems involving taxes, customs, permits, utilities or government agencies should have clear escalation mechanisms before they cause investors to defer projects or relocate.
We need red carpet, not red tape.
PEZA modernization should be prioritized, alongside stronger coordination among PEZA, BOI, BIR, Customs and other economic agencies.
Third, modernize tax administration.
Digitalization alone is no longer enough.
The BIR and Bureau of Customs should accelerate full e-invoicing, AI-enabled risk assessment, integrated government databases and automated customs and tax administration.
Technology should allow government to identify high-risk taxpayers more accurately while reducing unnecessary audits of businesses that consistently comply.
For honest taxpayers, modernization should mean fewer forms, fewer visits, faster transactions and greater certainty.
Fourth, pursue the revenues we are failing to collect.
We should strengthen enforcement against major tax evasion, illicit trade and unexplained wealth rather than repeatedly increasing the burden on the easiest taxpayers to collect from.
This includes appropriate reform of bank secrecy rules, subject to safeguards and due process, and a nationwide, evidence-based investigation of unexplained wealth where credible risk indicators exist.
Public officials, political dynasties, government contractors and major campaign donors should not be exempt from scrutiny when there are lawful grounds for investigation.
This is not about political persecution. It is about accountability, revenue recovery and restoring public trust.
Fifth, make government easier to deal with.
Ease of doing business is ultimately about time, predictability and accountability.
Every unnecessary permit is a cost. Every delayed approval is a cost. Every inconsistent interpretation of regulation is effectively another tax on investment.
This brings us to a broader question: Do higher taxes always produce higher revenues?
In a recent discussion with economist Prof. Arthur Laffer, we revisited the principle behind the Laffer Curve: tax rates and collections do not move upward indefinitely in a straight line because taxpayers and consumers change behavior.
This is particularly relevant as policymakers consider further increases in excise taxes.
Higher tobacco or vape taxes can serve legitimate health objectives. But policy cannot ignore enforcement and consumer behavior.
If legal cigarettes and vape products become substantially more expensive while smuggled and illicit alternatives remain cheaper, accessible and widely available, some consumers may simply move underground.
The unintended outcome could be troubling: higher statutory tax rates but weaker legitimate sales, more illicit trade and potentially less revenue than projected.
Tax policy must therefore look beyond the rate itself. Rates, enforcement, affordability, consumer behavior and illicit-market risks must be considered together.
The same logic strengthens the case for responsible income tax relief.
Government can recover revenues through better voluntary compliance, e-invoicing, AI-assisted enforcement, anti-illicit trade operations and adoption of the global minimum tax and QDMTT, ensuring that revenues from large multinational groups attributable to Philippine economic activity are not unnecessarily collected elsewhere.
This is why tax relief and fiscal discipline are not opposing goals.
We can lower the burden on honest taxpayers and collect more from evaders.
We can attract global investments while demanding accountability.
We can offer competitive incentives while requiring government institutions to perform.
Several structural reform proposals are already gaining attention from the President and policymakers, including increasing take-home pay, abolishing the travel tax, reforming bank secrecy and strengthening our ability to collect from large multinational enterprises.
That momentum should continue.
Ultimately, good governance is economic policy.
Global investors compare countries not only on tax rates but on regulatory certainty, institutional credibility, transparency and the rule of law.
The strongest investment promotion strategy is therefore not another slogan or roadshow.
It is a Philippines where workers keep more of what they earn, investors confidently enter and expand, major tax evaders are pursued instead of compliant taxpayers, and government becomes faster, simpler and more accountable.
Promote the Philippines abroad. Reform government at home.
More pay. More investments. Better government.
—-
Mon Abrea, CPA, MBA, MPA (Harvard), is a global tax policy expert and Chief Tax Advisor of Asian Consulting Group (ACGlobal). He is the author of Reimagining the World Without Corruption and Why Invest in the Philippines? CREATE MORE Edition. He has participated in tax and investment policy dialogues with policymakers and international institutions, including the OECD and World Bank.
Spotlight is BusinessWorld’s sponsored section that allows advertisers to amplify their brand and connect with BusinessWorld’s audience by publishing their stories on the BusinessWorld Web site. For more information, send an email to [email protected].
Join us on Viber at https://bit.ly/3hv6bLA to get more updates and subscribe to BusinessWorld’s titles and get exclusive content through www.bworld-x.com.
