• Login
Sunday, April 26, 2026
Geneva Times
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
Geneva Times
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
Home Switzerland

Ecological overhaul of Swiss economy faces ballot box defeat, poll finds

GenevaTimes by GenevaTimes
January 29, 2025
in Switzerland
Reading Time: 10 mins read
0
Ecological overhaul of Swiss economy faces ballot box defeat, poll finds
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


shopping trolley filled with food

Swiss shopping trolleys could become suddenly emptier if the initiative was accepted, its opponents warn.


Keystone / Gian Ehrenzeller





Generated with artificial intelligence.


A majority of Swiss voters both at home and abroad are set to reject the “environmental responsibility initiative” on February 9, according to a new survey.


This content was published on


January 29, 2025 – 06:00

The youth wing of the Green Party, the Young Greens, who demand rules to make the Swiss economy respect the planet’s ecological limits, is facing clear defeat as opposition to their idea picks up steam.

Less than two weeks before vote day, 61% of the electorate is now against the idea, according to the second survey by the gfs.bern research institute on behalf of the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation (SBC), swissinfo.ch’s parent company. The no camp has gained 12 percentage points in a month; just 37% of respondents are in favour of the idea, with 2% still undecided.

Swiss voters abroad, usually more keen on environmental reform than their Swiss-based compatriots, are also unenthused: 57% oppose the proposal, 42% back it, and 1% are undecided.

Opinions on the initiative are divided along classic lines for such environmental themes, gfs.bern says. Voters close to the Green Party, the left-wing Social Democrats and the centrist Liberal Greens back the idea, while those from all other parties reject it.

A certain schism is seen within the Liberal Greens: while grassroots voters are leaning towards supporting the initiative, the official party line is to vote no.

For the second survey in the run-up to the federal votes on February 9, 2025, gfs.bern polled 15,996 voters between January 15 and 23. The statistical margin of error is +/-2.8 percentage points.

Beyond left-wing and environmental circles, the only population segment in favour of the idea is the lowest-income one – people earning under CHF3,000 ($3,316) per month.

Earlier in the campaign, a majority of women backed the proposal, but this has also since changed – even if the initiative “still sparks more support among young women”, according to gfs.bern political analyst Martina Mousson.

Good question, bad answer

The survey nevertheless shows that a majority of voters agrees with the initiative’s general goal. Some 60% of those polled say natural resources should be conserved in order not to threaten the foundations of life on the planet.

But the proposed solution is not a popular one, with a majority of respondents fearing higher prices and a cost-of-living increase. This contradicts the stated aim of the Young Greens to find measures which are socially acceptable.

In short, the gfs.bern analysts write, “the underlying problem raised by the initiative is widely recognised, but it is not seen as proposing the right answer”.

Whereas voting days in Switzerland – which come around up to four times annually – usually involve several issues put to the ballot, the environmental responsibility initiative is the only one to be decided on February 9. This hasn’t seemed to help: up to now, it has enjoyed the least media attention of all people’s initiatives since 2018, according to the University of Zurich. And when it did get in the news, the tone was often negative.

More

teaser

More

Let’s Talk: disagreeing on how to save the planet




This content was published on


Jan 28, 2025



To preserve nature, we need to respect its limits. The two guests in our Let’s Talk debate agree on this but differ on what steps should be taken.



Read more: Let’s Talk: disagreeing on how to save the planet


Edited by Samuel Jaberg; translated from French by Domhnall O’Sullivan

Articles in this story

Read more

Big ship

More

Why Switzerland’s carbon footprint is bigger than you think




This content was published on


Jan 23, 2025



Per capita CO2 emissions in Switzerland are lower than the world average. But the picture changes radically when you consider the emissions related to products imported from abroad.



Read more: Why Switzerland’s carbon footprint is bigger than you think


Read More

Previous Post

Sabail district of Azerbaijan’s Baku showing high voter turnout at municipal poll (PHOTO)

Next Post

San Diego State's Miles Byrd makes ridiculous reverse layup to seal win against San Jose State

Next Post
San Diego State's Miles Byrd makes ridiculous reverse layup to seal win against San Jose State

San Diego State's Miles Byrd makes ridiculous reverse layup to seal win against San Jose State

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ADVERTISEMENT
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn

Explore the Geneva Times

  • About us
  • Contact us

Contact us:

editor@thegenevatimes.ch

Visit us

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin