• Login
Thursday, March 12, 2026
Geneva Times
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
Geneva Times
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
Home Europe

 US Supreme Court declines case seeking to overturn same-sex marriage ruling

GenevaTimes by GenevaTimes
November 10, 2025
in Europe
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


The Supreme Court has turned down a bid to have the justices revisit the court’s landmark decision a decade ago that guaranteed the right to same-sex marriage nationwide.

The high court on Monday turned down a petition from Kim Davis, a former county clerk in Kentucky who objected on religious grounds to issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Davis urged the court to use a lawsuit against her as a vehicle to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 ruling that legalized same-sex marriage in all states.

No justice noted any dissent or released any opinion as the court rejected Davis’ case in a routine order list.

Obergefell was issued on a 5-4 vote, with conservative Justice Anthony Kennedy joining the liberals to establish the same-sex marriage right. With Kennedy’s retirement in 2018 and President Donald Trump’s appointees later shoring up a 6-3 conservative majority, Davis’ lawyers hoped to muster the four justices needed to get the court to take up the issue again. But Davis’ petition, which appeared to many court watchers as a long-shot bid, fell short.

One member of the court, Justice Clarence Thomas, has called for the court to revisit Obergefell.

In 2022, when the Supreme Court ended the federal constitutional right to abortion, Thomas urged his colleagues in a concurring opinion to “reconsider” the same-sex marriage ruling. However, writing at the time for the court’s majority, Justice Samuel Alito insisted that “nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.”

Read More

Previous Post

Warren Buffett is ‘going quiet’ after he steps down as Berkshire Hathaway CEO this year. Read his farewell letter to shareholders

Next Post

Israeli supplier bears service costs for streamlined Swiss drones

Next Post
Israeli supplier bears service costs for streamlined Swiss drones

Israeli supplier bears service costs for streamlined Swiss drones

ADVERTISEMENT
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn

Explore the Geneva Times

  • About us
  • Contact us

Contact us:

editor@thegenevatimes.ch

Visit us

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin