• Login
Thursday, April 2, 2026
Geneva Times
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
Geneva Times
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
Home Business

‘US is officially a middleman now’: Investor calls Nvidia’s 15% chip tax ‘Patriotism as a Service’

GenevaTimes by GenevaTimes
August 12, 2025
in Business
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
‘US is officially a middleman now’: Investor calls Nvidia’s 15% chip tax ‘Patriotism as a Service’
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Nvidia and AMD can now resume AI chip exports to China—if they pay the U.S. government a 15% cut. Angel investor Gagan K Arora calls it what it looks like: “Patriotism-as-a-Service.”

“This isn’t national security—it’s a convenience fee,” Arora wrote in a scathing LinkedIn post after news broke that the U.S. will collect 15% of revenue from Nvidia and AMD’s China sales. “The chips were banned, the gates locked… and now the gates are reopened if you leave a 15% tip.”

Under the unprecedented deal, Nvidia and AMD must hand over a slice of their China earnings in exchange for export licenses—reversing bans previously framed as crucial to U.S. national security. The arrangement could net Washington an estimated $2 billion.

“The U.S. government is officially a middleman now,” Arora wrote. “If geopolitics were cricket, this is the moment the umpire is allowed to collect a commission before letting the batsman play again.”

The chips in question—Nvidia’s H20 and AMD’s MI308—had been restricted over fears they could supercharge China’s AI and military capabilities. Security experts, including former Trump officials, warned the chips could power surveillance platforms and autonomous weapons.

Critics slammed the move as hypocrisy. “You either have a national security problem or you don’t,” said Deborah Elms, head of trade policy at the Hinrich Foundation. “A 15% payment doesn’t fix that.”

Arora went further: “It’s been difficult to tell whether the U.S. President is a better businessman or a worse statesman.”

Legal scholars noted the fee may even violate the U.S. Constitution’s ban on export taxes. Meanwhile, on social media, investors labeled it a “shakedown” and a “tax on innovation.”

The backlash also triggered political unease. “Now the U.S. government is financially motivated to sell AI to China?” said Rep. Jake Auchincloss. “Shudder to think what a TikTok deal might look like.”

 

Read More

Previous Post

How to get AI to work in its 22 languages

Next Post

Seven more airlines to be hit by strikes in Spain this August

Next Post
Seven more airlines to be hit by strikes in Spain this August

Seven more airlines to be hit by strikes in Spain this August

ADVERTISEMENT
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn

Explore the Geneva Times

  • About us
  • Contact us

Contact us:

editor@thegenevatimes.ch

Visit us

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin