• Login
Friday, April 24, 2026
Geneva Times
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
Geneva Times
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
Home Business

Karnataka Governor Gehlot returns the Mineral Tax Bill, seeks clarification

GenevaTimes by GenevaTimes
January 23, 2025
in Business
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Karnataka Governor Gehlot returns the Mineral Tax Bill, seeks clarification
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


The Karnataka Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot has returned the Mineral Tax Bill, according to news reports. The Governor cited queries raised by mining associations as the reason for his decision.

Commenting on the development, Congress spokesperson, BL Shankar stated, “This Bill was introduced in the interest of the community. Both parties have already agreed to it. However, the Governor has raised certain queries and sent the bill back for further clarification.”

The Bill, which was passed by the Cabinet in December 2024, proposes provisions to levy a tax ranging from ₹20 to ₹100 per tonne for different minerals. The proposed tax per tonne is ₹100 for bauxite, laterite, manganese, and iron ore mineral-bearing land, ₹50 for copper ore, ₹20 for limeshell, ₹50 for byproducts of gold, and ₹40 for all other unspecified minerals.

This tax provision is projected to generate ₹4,207.95 crore in revenue, with an additional ₹505.9 crore expected from taxing land-bearing minerals annually.

Addressing the situation, VS Ugrappa, Former Member of the Lok Sabha and senior Congress leader, told businessline, “Bills traditionally go through a convention before being passed. They are usually discussed either within the party or in the legislature. That convention seems to be missing in this case.

Any Bill passed by the legislature undergoes a discussion on the floor of both houses. If such a bill has been passed by both houses either by majority or unanimously it is clear that the bill aligns with the provisions of the Constitution. Such Bills are typically brought by the government in the interest of the State.” Previously, 11 bills have been returned, which could hamper the development of the State, he noted.

SHARE

  • Copy link
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Telegram
  • LinkedIn
  • WhatsApp
  • Reddit

Published on January 23, 2025



Read More

Previous Post

German frontrunner vows permanent border controls after knife attack

Next Post

Traffic of vehicles, wagons transiting through Middle Corridor doubles – ASCO (PHOTO)

Next Post
Traffic of vehicles, wagons transiting through Middle Corridor doubles – ASCO (PHOTO)

Traffic of vehicles, wagons transiting through Middle Corridor doubles - ASCO (PHOTO)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ADVERTISEMENT
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn

Explore the Geneva Times

  • About us
  • Contact us

Contact us:

editor@thegenevatimes.ch

Visit us

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin