• Login
Sunday, February 22, 2026
Geneva Times
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
Geneva Times
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
Home Switzerland

Swiss to vote on making it easier to become Swiss

GenevaTimes by GenevaTimes
November 23, 2024
in Switzerland
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
Swiss to vote on making it easier to become Swiss
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


This week, an initiative aimed at making it easier to become Swiss cleared the 100,000 signature hurdle required to qualify for a referendum, reported RTS.

Non citizens are largely excluded from voting. Some exceptions allow some to vote at a municipal level. Excluding such a significant part of the population from the democratic process is undemocratic, say vote organisers. Swiss citizens on the other hand get to decide on issues that sometimes specifically affect non-Swiss residents.

Switzerland is one of the most difficult places to gain citizenship. The referendum, for which 104,603 valid signatures were collected, aims to make naturalisation easier in several ways. Currently, there is a 10-year residence requirement, the last 5 of which must have been on a C-permit. The initiative wants this cut to 5 years on any permit. It also wants to remove other requirements, such as evidence of integration and the requirement to not have received welfare in the years preceding an application for citizenship. Other requirements, such as mastering the local language and not having a criminal record, would remain but be applied less strictly. Language requirements would be lowered to a basic level and only crimes that result in long prison sentences would be considered when disqualifying someone from citizenship.

The vote organisers point out that around a quarter of Switzerland’s population are not Swiss. The initiative’s website sets out the arguments of the organisers in more detail.

The initiative is likely to be politically divisive. It has more support from the political left than the political right. It fits with the left’s greater emphasis on a more universal expression care and concern for people, regardless of national boundaries. By contrast, those on the right tend to emphasise care and concern for a nation or integrated group with a greater focus on loyalty and new comers respecting local rules and norms. They are therefore likely to be less open to the initiative’s planned softening of language, integration, welfare and criminal record requirements for fear of social disharmony.

More on this:
RTS article  (in French)  – Take a 5 minute French test now

For more stories like this on Switzerland follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Related posts



Read More

Previous Post

Three arrested in Spain for racist abuse at La Liga Clásico

Next Post

49ers QB Brock Purdy to miss Sunday’s game vs. Packers with shoulder injury

Next Post
49ers QB Brock Purdy to miss Sunday’s game vs. Packers with shoulder injury

49ers QB Brock Purdy to miss Sunday's game vs. Packers with shoulder injury

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ADVERTISEMENT
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn

Explore the Geneva Times

  • About us
  • Contact us

Contact us:

editor@thegenevatimes.ch

Visit us

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin