• Login
Tuesday, November 10, 2026
Geneva Times
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
Geneva Times
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
Home International

Judge denies motion to dismiss Lindsay Clancy’s murder case – media reports

GenevaTimes by GenevaTimes
November 9, 2026
in International
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
Judge denies motion to dismiss Lindsay Clancy’s murder case – media reports
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


A Massachusetts judge has denied a motion to dismiss the murder case against Lindsay Clancy, the US woman accused of murdering her three children.

The judge’s ruling comes after Clancy’s defence team requested dismissal of the case after her first trial ended in a mistrial in September, when a 12-person jury failed to reach a consensus.

The ruling clears the way for prosecutors to pursue the case. They could reduce the charges in a potential second trial or dismiss them altogether.

Clancy has not denied killing her children in 2023, but her defence team argues she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis at the time. Prosecutors say the killings were intentional.

Clancy’s defence team had argued to dismiss the case against her due to double jeopardy – a legal standard that says a person cannot be tried for the same crime twice.

Her lawyers argued that Judge William Sullivan, who presided over the August murder trial, acted prematurely when he declared a mistrial on 4 September, saying that he should have sought a viable alternative.

In his ruling on Monday, Sullivan said that a retrial would not unconstitutionally subject her to double jeopardy, according to court documents obtained by the BBC.

Sullivan also denied a defence motion to see records of the lone holdout juror in the case and to question the juror under oath. He said that questioning the juror “would have been impermissibly coercive”.

“Although a mistrial may be expensive in both human and monetary costs, it is not to be avoided by intrusion into the jury’s domain,” he wrote.

He also said that the possibility that “an unreasonably stubborn or eccentric juror” could be seated is “an unavoidable risk of the jury system”.

“Because the court concludes that there was manifest necessity for a mistrial based on the jury’s deadlock, a retrial on the murder indictments does not violate Clancy’s right not to be placed in double jeopardy,” he wrote.

The judge scheduled a hearing for 16 November to discuss when to hold a second trial. He has previously suggested it could begin in March.

Read More

Previous Post

Curt Cignetti Won’t Say If QB Josh Hoover Or Grant Wilson Will Start vs. No. 15 USC

Next Post

RuneScape Down? Jagex Investigates Login Server and Grand Exchange Issues as Thousands Report Problems

Next Post
RuneScape Down? Jagex Investigates Login Server and Grand Exchange Issues as Thousands Report Problems

RuneScape Down? Jagex Investigates Login Server and Grand Exchange Issues as Thousands Report Problems

ADVERTISEMENT
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn

Explore the Geneva Times

  • About us
  • Contact us

Contact us:

editor@thegenevatimes.ch

Visit us

© 2023 -2026 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil

© 2023 -2026 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin