• Login
Monday, June 29, 2026
Geneva Times
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
Geneva Times
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
Home Switzerland

The big issues for foreign residents on the Swiss political agenda this June

GenevaTimes by GenevaTimes
June 26, 2026
in Switzerland
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
The big issues for foreign residents on the Swiss political agenda this June
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter



Though the far-right move to curb immigration from the EU was defeated at the ballot box and no longer dominates Swiss news, other measures targeting foreign residents are fuelling political debates.

Four topics are – or will be in the near future – at the centre of parliamentary debates:

Security tax

During the recent parliamentary session, deputies in the National Council have approved a right-wing motion that would require foreign nationals residing in Switzerland to pay a fee towards the country’s security costs. 

It would be modelled on the existing exemption tax for military service, which is imposed on Swiss men who do not complete mandatory army or civil defence service.

It amounts to 3 percent of the annual taxable income, with a minimum payment of 400 francs a year.

While this measure must still be discussed  and voted on by the Council of States, passing it could  be problematic.

That’s because, as opponents point out, imposing such a tax on nationals of the EU and EFTA (Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein) “would be contrary” to the terms of the free movement of people agreement that Switzerland concluded with the European Union.

But this is not the only foreigner tax on the parliamentary agenda:

Immigration tax

Also called an ‘Infrastructure Tax’ and ‘Entry Fee’, this proposal was first brought up by the Swiss People’s Party (SVP) in 2023, and reiterated two years later by deputy Simon Michel from the Liberal-Radical Party (FDP). 

Since then, it has sparked various debates as well as a government report on a feasibility of such a tax.

The idea is for anyone moving to Switzerland to pay 3 percent of their income for 11 years, thus generating up to 1 billion francs annually, which would be redistributed among Switzerland’s population — for instance, in the form of a reduction in health insurance premiums.

However, in this case also, opponents point out that applying this fee to EU and EFTA nationals  would violate bilateral treaties.

In the meantime, the issue remains unresolved with further debates to follow.

READ MORE: Switzerland examines much-talked about immigration tax 

Permit ban for EU citizens with criminal records

Currently, under the free movement of people agreement, EU citizens with a record of minor criminal offences are not denied entry to Switzerland.

However, in June 2026, deputies in the Council of States have  followed the lead of the National Council and voted in favour of refusing residency permits to foreign nationals who have previously been convicted of a crime.

This move is based on the fact that known criminals, including mafia members from abroad, were able to settle in Switzerland.

The issue will be further debated in future sessions.

READ MORE: Swiss parliament backs permit ban if foreign residents fail criminal records check 

Easier naturalisation requirements

Still waiting to be put put on a schedule for the national vote, the  so-called ‘Democracy initiative’  aims to cut the wait time before a foreigner can apply for citizenship from the current 10 years of residency down to five.

The initiative also calls for the federal government (rather than cantons) to be responsible for naturalisation, so that the procedure is standardised across the country.

The Federal Council, as well as both chambers of the Parliament, are urging the ‘no vote, once this issue comes to the ballot box.

 

 

Read More

Previous Post

MEPs warn of women’s health ‘blind spot’

Next Post

USMNT’s Major Lineup Changes: Pulisic On Bench; Turner Starts At GK

Next Post
USMNT’s Major Lineup Changes: Pulisic On Bench; Turner Starts At GK

USMNT's Major Lineup Changes: Pulisic On Bench; Turner Starts At GK

ADVERTISEMENT
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn

Explore the Geneva Times

  • About us
  • Contact us

Contact us:

editor@thegenevatimes.ch

Visit us

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin