• Login
Sunday, March 29, 2026
Geneva Times
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil
No Result
View All Result
Geneva Times
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
Home Business

Record labels and Spotify seek $322M default judgment from pirate group Anna’s Archive

GenevaTimes by GenevaTimes
March 28, 2026
in Business
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Record labels and Spotify seek 2M default judgment from pirate group Anna’s Archive
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


The three major music companies and Spotify are seeking $322.2 million in damages from shadow library Anna’s Archive, after the pirate group allegedly released millions of music files in defiance of a court order.

As previously reported by MBW, the lawsuit was filed on January 2, 2026, after Anna’s Archive announced in December 2025 that it had scraped approximately 86 million music files from Spotify and planned to distribute them via BitTorrent.

The plaintiffs describe the scraping as “brazen theft of millions of files containing nearly all of the world’s commercial sound recordings.”

A motion for default judgment and an accompanying memorandum of law in support of the motion were filed on March 25 in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York — asking the court to rule in the plaintiffs’ favour without trial, given the defendant’s “failure to answer or otherwise defend against the claims in the Complaint.” You can read the statement of damages here and the memorandum here.

Anna’s Archive was placed in default on February 2 after failing to respond to the lawsuit.

Despite a court order issued by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on January 20 prohibiting Anna’s Archive from distributing copyrighted works, the filings reveal that the pirate group released a portion of the scraped files on or around February 9 via 47 separate torrents — in what the plaintiffs describe as “blatant disregard of the Preliminary Injunction.”

“Defendant’s contempt of the Court’s preliminary injunction order is flagrant and indisputable,” the memorandum states.

The plaintiffs include labels of Universal Music Group (UMG Recordings, Capitol Records), Sony Music Entertainment (Arista Music, Arista Records, Zomba Recording), and Warner Music Group (Atlantic Recording Corporation, Atlantic Music Group, Bad Boy Records, Elektra Entertainment, Fueled by Ramen, Warner Music International Services, Warner Records). Spotify is also a co-plaintiff.

The memorandum states that the torrents collectively made 2,806,041 individual music files available for download, including sound recordings owned by one or more of the record company plaintiffs. The links were removed from Anna’s Archive’s websites around February 11, but the plaintiffs note that due to the nature of BitTorrent, the files remain publicly available through the peer-to-peer network.

The $322.2 million total breaks down as follows: the record company plaintiffs are seeking $22.2 million in maximum statutory damages for willful copyright infringement — calculated at $150,000 for each of 148 sound recordings identified in the complaint.

Spotify is separately seeking $300 million in DMCA damages for circumvention of its digital rights management technology — calculated at $2,500 for each of the 120,000 files that the plaintiffs actually downloaded from the torrents during their investigation.

The plaintiffs describe the damages request — the first time a specific figure has been sought in the case — as “extremely conservative.” If Spotify sought DMCA damages on all 2.8 million released files, the total would exceed $7 billion. The record companies describe the 148 works cited as merely “an illustrative sample.”

The memorandum also cites Anna’s Archive’s own admissions. The filing states that Anna’s Archive has publicly acknowledged that it “deliberately violate[s] the copyright law in most countries,” and that its operators remain anonymous because those who run pirate libraries are “at high risk of being arrested” and “could face decades of prison time.”

The plaintiffs characterize Anna’s Archive as “an organization notorious for its admittedly illegal conduct.”

The court must now rule on the motion.Music Business Worldwide

Read More

Previous Post

Iran-backed Houthis join war with attack against Israel

Next Post

Kidnapped and tortured on an infamous migration route to Saudi Arabia

Next Post
Kidnapped and tortured on an infamous migration route to Saudi Arabia

Kidnapped and tortured on an infamous migration route to Saudi Arabia

ADVERTISEMENT
Facebook Twitter Instagram Youtube LinkedIn

Explore the Geneva Times

  • About us
  • Contact us

Contact us:

editor@thegenevatimes.ch

Visit us

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Editorial
  • Switzerland
  • Europe
  • International
  • UN
  • Business
  • Sports
  • More
    • Article
    • Tamil

© 2023 -2024 Geneva Times| Desgined & Developed by Immanuel Kolwin